Serverless - a Use Case for CloudFormation Modules? Let´s agree to “infrastructure as code” is a good thing. The next question is: What framework do you use? To compare the frameworks, we have the tRick-benchmark repository, where we model infrastructure with different frameworks. Here is a walk through how to use CloudFormation Modules. This should help you to compare the different frameworks.
How to: CloudFormation Makro CloudFormation vermisst gegenüber Terraform einige Funktionen, die das Erstellen von Infrastruktur vereinfachen können. Das ist grundsätzlich korrekt, allerdings gibt es in CloudFormation die Möglichkeit, sich selber um den Ei
Cloudformation as a description language With AWS CloudFormation, (almost) all AWS service can be described in a configuration language. This enables scripting of AWS infrastructure. Thus, AWS resources are well documented. The templates can also be store
Getting around circular CloudFormation dependencies Several posts complain about the inability of CloudFormation to apply a Lambda event function to an S3 Bucket with an dynamically generated name. The standard UseCase is an S3 Bucket with a Lambda event
Cloudformation als Beschreibungssprache Mit AWS CloudFormation lassen sich (fast) alle AWS Dienst in einer Konfigurationssprache beschreiben. Das ermöglicht Scripten von AWS-Infrastruktur. So sind die AWS Ressourcen gut dokumentiert. Die Templates können
CloudFormation does not cover all AWS Resource types. Terraform does a better job in covering resource types just in time. So if you want to use a resource type which CloudFormation does not support yet, but you want to use CloudFormation, you have to bui